After literally decades sitting neglected, I decided to try a refresh of my old bike. It was partly just to have a proect to work on, partly in fear of Sherri''s contiuing threat to have my ashes buried in it, and largely because I had designs of riding again (see “Ashes in the Handlebars”, July, 2018).
Though the refresh was successful and I did ride some, sanity returned, the family expressed their appropriate “concern” (are you crazy? Was a closer quote), and I realized that, at a minimum the 750 Suzy was probably a bigger ride than I should be attempting.
To sort of compensate, as I had already returned to model building to help while away my remaining time on this planet, in light of the restrictions my half artificial spine was imposing on me, including a number of motorcycles which intersted me. And of course these included a number of Suzukis.
And many of these are two stroke models. Suzuki was, IMO, the most successful builder of two strokers for the American market, and was still exporting them into the country for some time after I bought my 750 four stroke bike from them in 1977.
In fact, if I DID ride anotgher bike beside my GS, I would like a “popcorn popper” of some sort, likely no bigger than a 250. My last two stroke Suzy WAS a 250, and still ranks as the best bike I owned other than the GS. It was light, responsive, quick, and easy to live with. Though by today's standards the brakes and handling were marginal and you REALLY needed to understand that while it was easy to “wick it on,” getting it hauled down from its top speed was another story entirely.
I recently purchased a kit of a Suzuki 500cc two stroke racing bike, in a much larger scale than the rest of my miniature “fleet.” It will be the biggest of any of the bike models, as well as the largest displacement motor using that technology. It represents the pinnacle of that extinct breed, killed off by the need for environmental controls that appeared increasingly unlikely within any rational cost and price formula.
My favorite still remains the bike in this photograph of the model I built...the RG250. While I would be more than happy with my old X6 250, to the best of my knowledge there is no model available for that bike and so...
 |
| Yes, it's a model Sitting on my workbench... Dammit |
What is behind my love of these ridiculous sounding, ridiculously high revving, rridiculously low torque motors? Quite simple. I'm a little, low strength guy, and it is possible to get more performance for less weight than any “normal” four stroke bike could offer.
Consider this...at under 300 pounds and with 29 little horses, my X6 would hit 30 FASTER than my 512 pound leviathan of a 750, and was less than a second slower to 60. Sure, from there to 100 the GS would eat the X6 alive, and at 100 it ws done and the 750 would not even be breathing hard. But I can also say that the X6 was the only bike I evern ownned whose acceleration was so sharp and, perhaps even qualified as violent, that the first three gears went by as quickly as I could twist my wrist and move my left foot, and it was all I could to keep the bike from literally leaping out from under me, while I slid backwards until I was almost sliding off the back of the seat.
The first time I took my roommate's out, which convinced me I wanted one, it was ou on the Millhopper Road outside of Gainesville, and it literally left me breahless. And two stroke motors were so simple I literally took one apart and scraped the carbon from the cylinder head in my living room.
As the years went by the bikes did become more complex, adding (still simple compared to four cycle motors) things like rotary valves and even water cooling (not visible in the photo there IS a radiator buried inside that fairing), which much softened that popcorn popper whine four stroke guys just hated.
But it was environmental responsibility which finally killed them off. It was no longer justifiable to run motors which had to burn oil along with gasoline to run. I don't know why the tefchnology required that, and it doesn't really matter. Were there a somewhat more civilized version of the RG, with a two up seat, reasonable but not crazy power, and less costly than the many thousands these things bring (IF you can find one, that is), I'd be sorely tempted.
Just kidding
I think.
Suzuki RG 250 specs: 49hp, 287 pound dry weight, 6 speed transmission, 100mph top speed
Suzuki X6 250 specs: 29hp, 297 punds, 6 speed transmission, 100mph top speed hmm...seems familiar
No comments:
Post a Comment